| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chris <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Emile D Snyder <emile(at)cosource(dot)com>, Ian Turner <vectro(at)pipeline(dot)com>, Eric Webber <streethockey(at)ureach(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: POSTGRESQL vs. ORACLE 8i &Sybase & Interbase etc |
| Date: | 2000-09-01 03:45:54 |
| Message-ID: | 14878.967779954@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Chris <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Emile D Snyder wrote:
>>
>> I know there's been a certain amount of buzz over the
>> usefulness/methodology of the tests, but Great Bridge just published a set
>> of tests using "Major Proprietary #1", ...#2, etc. kind of terminology.
> Of which #1 may or may not be Oracle, and #2 may or may not be MSSQL.
> :-)
The page of followup details that GB posted a little later includes
version numbers of all the tested servers. These provide, um, a
pretty broad hint about the identity of Proprietary #1 and Proprietary
#2...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | JinMing Qiu | 2000-09-01 04:57:01 | |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2000-09-01 03:14:32 | Re: referential integrity |