Re: Rethinking autovacuum.c memory handling

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rethinking autovacuum.c memory handling
Date: 2017-09-23 17:28:56
Message-ID: 14871.1506187736@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I have spent some time looking at your patch and testing it. This
> looks sane. A small comment that I have would be to add an assertion
> at the top of perform_work_item to be sure that it is called in the
> memory context of AutovacMemCxt.

Done like that, thanks for reviewing!

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-09-23 17:36:23 Re: Rethinking autovacuum.c memory handling
Previous Message Bossart, Nathan 2017-09-23 17:27:08 Re: Rethinking autovacuum.c memory handling