Re: Draft release notes for next week's back-branch releases

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Draft release notes for next week's back-branch releases
Date: 2017-05-06 15:25:03
Message-ID: 14867.1494084303@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Hmm, the 2bef06d51 and 56e19d938 are fixes for different bugs, we can
> keep them together since result of both is corrupted snapshot, but the
> description can't just mangle pieces of text from different commits
> together like this as that's misleading.

OK, can you suggest better wording?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Petr Jelinek 2017-05-06 15:49:33 Re: Draft release notes for next week's back-branch releases
Previous Message David Rowley 2017-05-06 13:57:37 Atomics for heap_parallelscan_nextpage()