Re: LWLock optimization for multicore Power machines

From: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
To: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: LWLock optimization for multicore Power machines
Date: 2017-02-03 20:31:26
Message-ID: 1486153886.26345.1.camel@oopsware.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 20:11 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 8:01 PM, Alexander Korotkov <
> a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, I have no big enough Power machine at hand to
> > reproduce
> > that results.  Actually, I have no Power machine at hand at
> > all.  So,
> > lwlock-power-2.patch was written "blindly".  I would very
> > appreciate if
> > someone would help me with testing and benchmarking.
> >
>
> UPD: It appears that Postgres Pro have access to big Power machine
> now.
> So, I can do testing/benchmarking myself.
>

Hi Alexander,

We currently also have access to a LPAR on an E850 machine with 4
sockets POWER8 running a Ubuntu 16.04 LTS Server ppc64el OS. I can do
some tests next week, if you need to verify your findings.

Thanks,

Bernd

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-02-03 20:34:43 Re: LWLock optimization for multicore Power machines
Previous Message Corey Huinker 2017-02-03 20:03:23 Re: \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: PSQL commands: \quit_if, \quit_unless)