"Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)hotmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I thought you said this was just syntactic sugar for capabilities we
>> already had?
> My mistake. I am sorry. I have to store somewhere flag. One bit, which
> signalise "don't use OUT arguments as function's parameters".
Huh? What exactly is the meaning of the arguments then?
It sounds to me like this might be better thought of as a new
proargmode value, but I'm quite unsure what you're talking about ...
regards, tom lane