Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-11 Call for Reviewers

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-rrreviewers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-11 Call for Reviewers
Date: 2009-11-12 19:12:51
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-rrreviewers
Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> The set of patches I have the least feel for are the five ECPG 
> submissions, some of which were reviewed already.  I would particularly 
> appreciate any early information reviewers might provide about their 
> capability/willingness to work on that set.  Those are not so easy to 
> just split among multiple people due to how they relate to one another.

AFAIK the ecpg patches are all waiting on Michael Meskes to have time
to review/commit them.  ecpg is pretty much his turf and no other
committers are likely to touch these patches.  If anyone really wants
to review them, of course, that's fine ... but I don't think you should
assign them to someone just because the CF process says to.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Mark HammondsDate: 2009-11-12 19:27:47
Subject: pg_dump enhancement proposal
Previous:From: Selena DeckelmannDate: 2009-11-12 19:07:08
Subject: Re: Patch committers

pgsql-rrreviewers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2009-11-12 19:52:20
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-11 Call for Reviewers
Previous:From: Greg SmithDate: 2009-11-12 19:05:52
Subject: Re: CommitFest 2009-11 Call for Reviewers

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group