Re: New version numbering practices

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New version numbering practices
Date: 2016-08-01 18:02:18
Message-ID: 14833.1470074538@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I suspect I'll end up using 10.x somewhat frequently though I'm mostly on
> the lists. I suspect the choice will be dependent on context and channel.

Hmm, that seems like a workable answer as well, and one that's traceable
to our past habits.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-08-01 18:08:56 HandleParallelMessages contains CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS?
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2016-08-01 17:59:53 Re: pg_replication_origin_xact_reset() and its argument variables