Re: PG Patch (fwd) [OpenServer followup #1]

From: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
To: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PG Patch (fwd) [OpenServer followup #1]
Date: 2003-07-19 16:58:26
Message-ID: 148310000.1058633906@lerlaptop.lerctr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Follow-up to a question from Bruce on the phone, re: the open server patch
2nd to follow.

Kean has graciously agreed to answer questions if y'all need them answered.

LER

------------ Forwarded Message ------------
Date: Friday, July 18, 2003 23:24:47 -0700
From: Kean Johnston <jkj(at)sco(dot)com>
To: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Cc:
Subject: Re: PG Patch

Larry Rosenman wrote:
> I got a question from the PG Core Team (Bruce Momjian) about the
> rpathdir portion of
> your patch.
>
> Why can't it use libdir? Or can we wrap it in .if (port,=,sco) type
> stuff?
>
> There's concern that we'll break other platforms.

Since OSR5 was the only platform that defines it, not much chance of
breaking anything, and other platform may find it useful when people
finally understand all of the security implications about using DT_RUNPATH
in ELF. I *ALWAYS* hard-code the full path so that libraries cannot be
subverted by a user by setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH.

Kean

---------- End Forwarded Message ----------

--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Larry Rosenman 2003-07-19 16:59:08 Re: PG Patch (fwd) [openserver patch followup #2]
Previous Message Joe Conway 2003-07-19 04:23:46 Re: [HACKERS] allowed user/db variables