Re: Proposal - libpq Type System beta-0.8a (was PGparam)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Andrew Chernow" <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>, "Markus Schiltknecht" <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal - libpq Type System beta-0.8a (was PGparam)
Date: 2008-01-08 22:05:23
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> That said, we have been a little dismayed in the lack of comment.

Personally, I'm ignoring this thread, as well as the one on
partitioning, because I'm up to my arse in 8.3-release alligators.
I'm going to try hard not to think about any 8.4 development issues
until 8.3 is actually out the door and we branch for 8.4 development.

I can't say how many other people are equally pressed for time ...
but seeing the minimal attention that seems to be getting paid to
open 8.3 issues, it doesn't look to me like the community as a whole
has a lot of spare cycles right now.

regards, tom lane

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2008-01-08 22:33:51 Re: Proposal - libpq Type System beta-0.8a (was PGparam)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-01-08 21:40:20 Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4