Re: 7.1.3 not using index

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Daniel Kalchev <daniel(at)digsys(dot)bg>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 7.1.3 not using index
Date: 2001-12-03 17:34:43
Message-ID: 14769.1007400883@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Daniel Kalchev <daniel(at)digsys(dot)bg> writes:
> (table has ~30k rows)
> EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM r where d = 8;
> The result is
> NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
> Seq Scan on r (cost=0.00...3041.13 rows=7191 width=4)

Seqscan is the right plan to retrieve 7k rows out of a 30k table.
So the question is whether that estimate is in the right ballpark
or not. How many rows are there really with d=8? If it's way off,
what do you get from

select attname,attdispersion,s.*
from pg_statistic s, pg_attribute a, pg_class c
where starelid = c.oid and attrelid = c.oid and staattnum = attnum
and relname = 'r';

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-12-03 17:42:51 Re: Second call for platform testing
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-12-03 17:14:21 Re: Second call for platform testing