Re: bgwriter never dies

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
Cc: "'Jan Wieck'" <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: bgwriter never dies
Date: 2004-02-26 22:09:21
Message-ID: 14768.1077833361@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Should we have a pgmon process that watches the postmaster
> and restarts it if required?

I doubt it; in practice the postmaster is *very* reliable (because it
doesn't do much), and so I'm not sure that adding a watchdog is going to
increase the net reliability of the system. The sorts of things that
could take out the postmaster are likely to take out a watchdog too.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jean-Michel POURE 2004-02-26 22:11:26 Why not fork PHP.NET
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-02-26 22:05:13 Re: Tablespaces