Re: SELinux & Redhat

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jeff - <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SELinux & Redhat
Date: 2005-05-06 15:28:42
Message-ID: 14759.1115393322@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-performance

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Am Freitag, 6. Mai 2005 16:55 schrieb Bruce Momjian:
>> A blurb about what? No one else has reported such a problem so we have
>> no reason to assume it isn't a misconfiguration on your end.

> *Countless* people are constantly reporting problems that can be
> attributed to selinux.

That's mostly because selinux outright broke postgres in the initial
FC3 releases :-(. I have to take most of the blame for this myself;
I didn't realize there might be problems, and didn't test adequately.
I believe the problems are all resolved in the latest Fedora RPMs,
though this pg_dump report may be something new.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim GUNDUZ 2005-05-06 15:33:20 Re: SELinux & Redhat
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-05-06 15:23:54 Re: SELinux & Redhat

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim GUNDUZ 2005-05-06 15:33:20 Re: SELinux & Redhat
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-05-06 15:23:54 Re: SELinux & Redhat