Re: Problem with locks

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Problem with locks
Date: 2007-08-28 03:31:00
Message-ID: 14736.1188271860@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> I think we should go ahead and print a LOG message in the case where a
> deadlock is detected.

After chewing on it some more, I liked this patch better ... but I found
a couple other issues, particularly with the soft-deadlock-recovery
messaging sequence. Modified version committed.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2007-08-28 05:32:36 Re: Insufficient attention to security in contrib (mostly)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-08-28 01:14:44 Re: Insufficient attention to security in contrib (mostly)