Re: Moving responsibility for logging "database system is shut down"

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Moving responsibility for logging "database system is shut down"
Date: 2016-02-10 21:39:59
Message-ID: 14701.1455140399@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> So I propose the attached patch. Any objections? Should this get
>> back-patched? It's arguably a bug, though surely a minor one, that
>> the message comes out when it does.

> I would vote against a back-patch. And I kind of agree with Jim's
> comments that we ought to consider sprinkling a few more debug
> messages into the shutdown sequence.

[ shrug... ] I won't stand in the way of someone else figuring out
what makes sense there, but I don't intend to do it; and I don't think
that the quick hacks I did over the last couple days make a reasonable
basis for a permanent patch.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-02-10 22:15:04 Remove or weaken hints about "effective resolution of sleep delays is 10 ms"?
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2016-02-10 21:27:28 Re: old bug in full text parser