| From: | rob stone <floriparob(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 9.6beta3 |
| Date: | 2016-07-31 23:28:57 |
| Message-ID: | 1470007737.6480.3.camel@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 2016-07-29 at 12:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> rob stone <floriparob(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > So, could somebody tell me if the 9.6beta1 version of initdb
> > contained
> > an incorrect version constant?
>
> It did, see
>
> https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git&a=commitdiff&h=99
> dd8b05aa5647a59f30ca67e67e2e3377f50094
>
> You would have had to do an initdb or pg_upgrade for the new version
> anyway because of other catalog changes.
>
> regards, tom lane
Thanks for that. Back to the drawing board. Only testing the beta
versions so no real harm done.
Cheers,
rob
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2016-08-01 00:26:38 | Re: pg_archivecleanup standalone bash script |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-07-31 22:15:45 | Re: Proposal "stack trace" like debugging option in PostgreSQL |