Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Fixes gram.y

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>,pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org,Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Fixes gram.y
Date: 2002-03-20 05:27:28
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> What's standard about it?

> ISO/IEC 9075-2:1999 clause 19.1 general rule 1 c) to be exact. ;-)

Hmm.  Looks like we need a wholesale revision of command tags, indeed.
At least if we want to consider command tags to be the data that
satisfies this spec requirement.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2002-03-20 05:48:52
Subject: Re: Notify argument?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-03-20 05:25:09
Subject: Re: 7.2 crash...

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-03-20 05:40:30
Subject: Re: Eurodates by default
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2002-03-20 04:32:54
Subject: Re: Eurodates by default

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group