Re: [HACKERS] Fixes gram.y

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Fixes gram.y
Date: 2002-03-20 05:27:28
Message-ID: 14687.1016602048@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> What's standard about it?

> ISO/IEC 9075-2:1999 clause 19.1 general rule 1 c) to be exact. ;-)

Hmm. Looks like we need a wholesale revision of command tags, indeed.
At least if we want to consider command tags to be the data that
satisfies this spec requirement.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2002-03-20 05:48:52 Re: Notify argument?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-03-20 05:25:09 Re: 7.2 crash...

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-03-20 05:40:30 Re: Eurodates by default
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-03-20 04:32:54 Re: Eurodates by default