Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 06:31:59PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> Any thoughts from others about whether to rename clientdn to client_dn >> to allow better naming of the new fields?
> Makes sense. The SSL acronyms can get very complex.
+1. It seems unlikely to me that there are very many applications out there that have references to this view, so we can probably get away with rationalizing the field names.