Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery
Date: 2008-10-07 15:05:45
Message-ID: 14677.1223391945@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

"Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> I'm just grumpy because I can't see a way to do the
>>> patch-on-patch-on-patch that I'll need to make this all work for Nov 1.
>>> So big patch here we come. But that's just the way it is and I'll stop
>>> honking about it.
>>
>> This is one of the problems that DVCSs are supposed to solve ... have
>> you tried Git?

> I think the other problem here is that the difficulty of getting the
> patch landed increases more than linearly with its size.

Yeah. Tools aren't really the key problem there IMHO.

I agree with Simon that it would be a good thing if this patch got
landed before he went on to the next part. But personally I'm a bit
burned out from commitfest and am not eager to go take a third look
at the patch right now. Does anyone else want to review it?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-10-07 15:08:58 Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery
Previous Message Robert Haas 2008-10-07 14:46:28 Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-10-07 15:08:58 Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery
Previous Message Robert Haas 2008-10-07 14:46:28 Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery