Re: Improving RLS planning

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improving RLS planning
Date: 2017-01-18 14:36:57
Message-ID: 14670.1484750217@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
>> Thanks for the review. Attached is an updated patch that I believe
>> addresses all of the review comments so far. The code is unchanged from
>> v2, but I improved the README, some comments, and the regression tests.

> I've reviewed your updates and they answer all of my comments and I
> appreciate the EC regression tests you added.

> I also agree with Dean's down-thread suggested regression test change.

Thanks for reviewing --- I'll do something with that test case and
push it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2017-01-18 14:40:44 Re: References to arbitrary database objects that are suitable for pg_dump
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-01-18 14:36:08 pgsql: Add function to import operating system collations