Re: Rolling v7.2.1 ...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Rolling v7.2.1 ...
Date: 2002-03-26 04:58:16
Message-ID: 14649.1017118696@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Marc G. Fournier writes:
>> Try her out and let me know if there are any problems ... the build looks
>> clean, sizes all look right ...

> ... but the contained documentation is for 7.3.

On the subject of contained documentation, I notice

*** postgresql-7.2.1/doc/src/sgml/version.sgml Mon Mar 18 18:04:11 2002
--- REL7_2/doc/src/sgml/version.sgml Thu May 10 21:46:33 2001
***************
*** 3,7 ****
documentation. In text, use for example &version; to refer to them.
-->

! <!entity version "7.2.1">
! <!entity majorversion "7.2.1">
--- 3,7 ----
documentation. In text, use for example &version; to refer to them.
-->

! <!entity version "7.2">
! <!entity majorversion "7.2">

Is this right, or should "majorversion" still be 7.2? Right offhand
the latter seems correct ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-03-26 05:09:37 Re: Rolling v7.2.1 ...
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-03-26 04:44:26 Re: Rolling v7.2.1 ...