Re: Question and suggestion about application binary compatibility policy

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Question and suggestion about application binary compatibility policy
Date: 2016-05-30 09:49:59
Message-ID: 1464601799.2179.73.camel@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Sorry I fail to understand what you mean with "legal"? Are you
> > wondering
> > about license restrictions? There are none.
>
> Sorry, I just meant "correct" or "valid".

Ah ok, thanks for clarifying.

> > As for compatibility, that's what major version numbers are for.
> > This is
> > not a PostgreSQL topic, but a general system one as for instance
> > the same
> > holds for libc.
>
> Yes, but Windows users probably don't understand or know it.  So, I
> suggested explicitly describing the application binary compatibility
> policy in the PostgreSQL manual.  What do you think about it?

Couldn't you point your customer to the system documentation?

Personally I don't think standard system behavior should be documented
for each application relying on it but ymmv.

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael at xmpp dot meskes dot org
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mikael Kjellström 2016-05-30 10:51:43 Re: Further stabilization of isolationtester's timeouts test
Previous Message Dean Rasheed 2016-05-30 08:26:00 Re: Re: Request for Patch Feedback: Lag & Lead Window Functions Can Ignore Nulls