Re: WIP Patch for GROUPING SETS phase 1

From: 彭瑞华 <ruihua(dot)peng(at)163(dot)com>
To: "Michael Paquier" <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk, postgresql <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP Patch for GROUPING SETS phase 1
Date: 2015-04-12 11:52:33
Message-ID: 1462cf74.bcae.14cad7959ae.Coremail.ruihua.peng@163.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

ok, I will try it using git master branch source code. thanks! Of course, using gsp-all-latest.patch this time.

At 2015-04-12 14:23:46, "Michael Paquier" <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 2:26 PM, 彭瑞华 <ruihua(dot)peng(at)163(dot)com> wrote:
>> I am using postgesql 9.4.0. Thanks for your great work on grouping sets
>> patch effort.
>> I am now compiling postgresql from source code 9.4.0 on Linux platform with
>> [gsp-all.patch] successed and grouping function well, but failed on window
>> platform(windows 2003 or window 7).
>> It shows unrecognized keywords: grouping, cube, etc.
>> Good suggestions or tips? thanks a lot!
>
>When reviewing or testing a patch targeted for integration in 9.5, you
>should avoid using a previous major version but you should apply the
>patch on a version based on one of the latest commits of master branch
>in the git repository of Postgres. I am guessing that you cannot get
>the patch compiling because of some code conflicts.
>--
>Michael
>
>
>--
>Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>To make changes to your subscription:
>http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2015-04-12 13:30:45 Re: TABLESAMPLE patch
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2015-04-12 08:18:38 Re: FDW oddity