Re: Feature Request --- was: PostgreSQL Performance Tuning

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Carlos Moreno <moreno_pg(at)mochima(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Feature Request --- was: PostgreSQL Performance Tuning
Date: 2007-04-27 14:36:40
Message-ID: 14600.1177684600@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-performance

Carlos Moreno <moreno_pg(at)mochima(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> But
>> the fundamental problem remains that we don't know that much about
>> how the installation will be used.

> Notice that the second part of my suggestion covers this --- have
> additional switches to initdb

That's been proposed and rejected before, too; the main problem being
that initdb is frequently a layer or two down from the user (eg,
executed by initscripts that can't pass extra arguments through, even
assuming they're being invoked by hand in the first place).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Lewis 2007-04-27 14:36:52 Re: Feature Request --- was: PostgreSQL Performance Tuning
Previous Message Marcelo de Moraes Serpa 2007-04-27 14:34:28 Using a library compiled for 8.3 in 8.2

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Lewis 2007-04-27 14:36:52 Re: Feature Request --- was: PostgreSQL Performance Tuning
Previous Message Michael Stone 2007-04-27 14:30:25 Re: Feature Request --- was: PostgreSQL Performance Tuning