Re: VACUUM FULL, CLUSTER, and REPACK block on other sessions' temp tables

From: Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>
To: Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: VACUUM FULL, CLUSTER, and REPACK block on other sessions' temp tables
Date: 2026-03-26 11:53:29
Message-ID: 145c49b9-1d40-4a4a-8667-777d8bb951ed@uni-muenster.de
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 26/03/2026 12:25, Antonin Houska wrote:
> Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> I don't think such a TAP test is necessary.
> +1

I've kept the tests in a separate file so the committer can easily skip
them if needed.

Thanks for the feedback, everyone!

Best, Jim

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2026-03-26 11:56:35 Re: pg_stat_replication.*_lag sometimes shows NULL during active replication
Previous Message Ashutosh Sharma 2026-03-26 11:52:52 Re: synchronized_standby_slots behavior inconsistent with quorum-based synchronous replication