From: | Pavel Golub <pavel(at)microolap(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel(at)mamane(dot)lu>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: LibreOffice driver 1: Building libpq with Mozilla LDAP instead of OpenLDAP |
Date: | 2011-12-14 07:05:33 |
Message-ID: | 145474486.20111214090533@gf.microolap.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello, Tom.
You wrote:
TL> Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On 12/13/2011 11:07 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>>> On MacOS X and Microsoft Windows, the world is far more messy. There
>>> are several ways to install libpq (one-click installer, fink,
>>> MacPorts, ...), and each of these ways allows the user to select an
>>> install location (or a prefix thereof) freely.
>> This is less controversial.
TL> Yeah, I'm aware that sane handling of library dependencies is
TL> practically impossible under Windows, but I didn't see how that would
TL> result in wanting to change the configure script. I wasn't thinking
TL> about OSX though. (You're aware that Apple ships a perfectly fine
TL> libpq.so in Lion, no?)
Is it true? Really? Where can we read about it?
TL> regards, tom lane
--
With best wishes,
Pavel mailto:pavel(at)gf(dot)microolap(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2011-12-14 08:00:16 | Re: NOTIFY with tuples |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2011-12-14 06:38:15 | proposal: bytea_agg aggregate function |