Re: LibreOffice driver 1: Building libpq with Mozilla LDAP instead of OpenLDAP

From: Pavel Golub <pavel(at)microolap(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel(at)mamane(dot)lu>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: LibreOffice driver 1: Building libpq with Mozilla LDAP instead of OpenLDAP
Date: 2011-12-14 07:05:33
Message-ID: 145474486.20111214090533@gf.microolap.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello, Tom.

You wrote:

TL> Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On 12/13/2011 11:07 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>>> On MacOS X and Microsoft Windows, the world is far more messy. There
>>> are several ways to install libpq (one-click installer, fink,
>>> MacPorts, ...), and each of these ways allows the user to select an
>>> install location (or a prefix thereof) freely.

>> This is less controversial.

TL> Yeah, I'm aware that sane handling of library dependencies is
TL> practically impossible under Windows, but I didn't see how that would
TL> result in wanting to change the configure script. I wasn't thinking
TL> about OSX though. (You're aware that Apple ships a perfectly fine
TL> libpq.so in Lion, no?)

Is it true? Really? Where can we read about it?

TL> regards, tom lane

--
With best wishes,
Pavel mailto:pavel(at)gf(dot)microolap(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2011-12-14 08:00:16 Re: NOTIFY with tuples
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2011-12-14 06:38:15 proposal: bytea_agg aggregate function