Re: Hints proposal

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Bucky Jordan" <bjordan(at)lumeta(dot)com>, "Joshua Marsh" <icub3d(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Hints proposal
Date: 2006-10-18 02:55:29
Message-ID: 14539.1161140129@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> writes:
> When it happens it tends to look something like this:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2006-01/msg00154.php

> Funny that for all the people who claim that improving the planner should be
> the primary goal that no one ever took interest in the above case.

Well, you didn't provide sufficient data for anyone else to reproduce
the problem ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message NikhilS 2006-10-18 05:57:39 Re: Additional stats for Relations
Previous Message Gavin Sherry 2006-10-18 02:49:23 Re: pg_internal.init is hazardous to your health

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2006-10-18 03:41:40 Re: Jdbc/postgres performance
Previous Message Craig A. James 2006-10-18 02:47:41 Re: Optimization of this SQL sentence