Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums
Date: 2017-11-26 20:19:41
Message-ID: 1451.1511727581@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Mumble. It's a property I'm pretty hesitant to give up, especially
>> since the stats views have worked like that since day one. It's
>> inevitable that weakening that guarantee would break peoples' queries,
>> probably subtly.

> You mean, queries against the stats views, or queries in general? If
> the latter, by what mechanism would the breakage happen?

Queries against the stats views, of course.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Dilger 2017-11-26 22:31:08 Re: Memory error in src/backend/replication/logical/origin.c
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-11-26 20:05:27 Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums