From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums |
Date: | 2017-11-26 20:19:41 |
Message-ID: | 1451.1511727581@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Mumble. It's a property I'm pretty hesitant to give up, especially
>> since the stats views have worked like that since day one. It's
>> inevitable that weakening that guarantee would break peoples' queries,
>> probably subtly.
> You mean, queries against the stats views, or queries in general? If
> the latter, by what mechanism would the breakage happen?
Queries against the stats views, of course.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Dilger | 2017-11-26 22:31:08 | Re: Memory error in src/backend/replication/logical/origin.c |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-11-26 20:05:27 | Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums |