Re: Expanded Objects and Order By

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)cleverelephant(dot)ca>
Cc: Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Expanded Objects and Order By
Date: 2016-01-21 00:39:37
Message-ID: 14506.1453336777@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)cleverelephant(dot)ca> writes:
> Thank the Maker, it is reproduceable: returning an expanded header in the _in function is not appreciated in a very narrow number of cases.

Thanks for finding a test case! I'll check into it shortly.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2016-01-21 01:04:31 Re: Re: pglogical_output - a general purpose logical decoding output plugin
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-01-21 00:15:59 Re: removal of unused argument in ginInsertCleanup()