| From: | Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Jakub Glapa <jakub(dot)glapa(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabio Isabettini <fisabettini(at)voipfuture(dot)com>, Arne Roland <a(dot)roland(at)index(dot)de>, Sand Stone <sand(dot)m(dot)stone(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rick Otten <rottenwindfish(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: dsa_allocate() faliure |
| Date: | 2019-02-10 16:11:22 |
| Message-ID: | 14504121549815082@myt5-02b80404fd9e.qloud-c.yandex.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Hi
> I ran overnight with this patch, but all parallel processes ended up stuck in
> the style of bug#15585. So that's either not the root cause, or there's a 2nd
> issue.
Maybe i missed something in this discussion, but you can reproduce bug#15585? How? With this testcase: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAEepm%3D1MvOE-Sfv1chudx5KEmw_qHYrj8F9Og_WmdBRhXSQ%2B%2Bw%40mail.gmail.com ?
regards, Sergei
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-02-10 16:12:58 | Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages) |
| Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2019-02-10 16:00:35 | Re: dsa_allocate() faliure |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2019-02-10 16:50:07 | Re: dsa_allocate() faliure |
| Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2019-02-10 16:00:35 | Re: dsa_allocate() faliure |