Re: Less-silly selectivity for JSONB matching operators

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alexey Bashtanov <bashtanov(at)imap(dot)cc>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Less-silly selectivity for JSONB matching operators
Date: 2020-03-31 16:44:53
Message-ID: 14445.1585673093@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alexey Bashtanov <bashtanov(at)imap(dot)cc> writes:
>> I was wondering about DEFAULT_MATCHING_SEL. The difference in purpose
>> from DEFAULT_MATCH_SEL wouldn't be too obvious, but then it probably
>> wouldn't be anyway.

> Fine with me, especially if both new functions are renamed accordingly.

Yup, that would make sense, will do it like that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-03-31 17:04:28 Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
Previous Message James Coleman 2020-03-31 16:43:14 Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)