From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Ekaterina Sokolova <e(dot)sokolova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Proposal: Limitations of palloc inside checkpointer |
Date: | 2025-08-06 18:58:34 |
Message-ID: | 1439188.1754506714@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I'm going to push this if no objections.
I looked at these patches while preparing release notes, and
found an oversight. CheckpointerShmemInit does
CheckpointerShmem->max_requests = Min(NBuffers, MAX_CHECKPOINT_REQUESTS);
but CheckpointerShmemSize still does
size = add_size(size, mul_size(NBuffers, sizeof(CheckpointerRequest)));
So if NBuffers is more than MAX_CHECKPOINT_REQUESTS, we will allocate
extra CheckpointerRequest array entries that we will never use,
wasting shared memory. Admittedly the amount is small relative to the
shared buffers themselves, but at the very least this is confusing.
The comment in CheckpointerShmemSize needs adjustment, too.
Also, the reason I was studying it so carefully is that I could not
figure out who to credit for the back-patched fix. It looks like
the original suggestion for the minimal fix was Alexander's, but
other people seem to have had their fingers in the actual patch
writing --- or am I misreading the thread?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2025-08-06 19:01:24 | Re: fix ancient typo in transformRelOptions() |
Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2025-08-06 18:38:38 | Re: More protocol.h replacements this time into walsender.c |