Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2

From: Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Date: 2015-07-20 07:18:00
Message-ID: 1437376680972-5858502.post@n5.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote:

>synchronous_standby_name= is already 25 characters, so that leaves 115
characters - are they always single byte chars?

I am sorry, I did not get why there is a 140 byte limit. Can you please
explain?

-----
Beena Emerson

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.nabble.com/Support-for-N-synchronous-standby-servers-take-2-tp5849384p5858502.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marti Raudsepp 2015-07-20 07:31:11 Re: [PATCH] pg_upgrade fails when postgres/template1 isn't in default tablespace
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2015-07-20 07:09:53 Re: postgres_fdw join pushdown (was Re: Custom/Foreign-Join-APIs)