Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2

From: Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Date: 2015-07-07 05:38:25
Message-ID: 1436247505382-5856869.post@n5.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Amit wrote:
> What if we write the above as:
>
> remotes-1 (london_servers-2 [london1, london2, london3], nc_servers-1
> [nc1, nc2])

Yes this we can consider.

Thanks,

-----
Beena Emerson

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.nabble.com/Support-for-N-synchronous-standby-servers-take-2-tp5849384p5856869.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2015-07-07 06:03:50 Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Previous Message Beena Emerson 2015-07-07 05:32:57 Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2