Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> I don't think it makes sense to create a new function in dblink either
> -- we're only talking about two lines of added redundancy which is
> less lines of code than a new function would add.
Indeed, and I think the claim that such a function "encapsulates" anything
useful is pretty silly as well. I think the committed patch is fine.
regards, tom lane