From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
Cc: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Igor Korot <ikorot01(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Another documentation issue |
Date: | 2025-04-23 18:28:16 |
Message-ID: | 1430373.1745432896@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
>> On 23 Apr 2025, at 09:16, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2025-04-23 at 00:21 -0500, Igor Korot wrote:
>>> No explanation of what is "supported system" is given...
>> According to the source, it is "systems that have posix_fadvise()". We could document that,
>> but I don't know if it would help many people. I am not sure how easy and feasible it is
>> to research which versions of which operating systems qualify.
>> From memory it's supported on FreeBSD, NetBSD and Linux with Windows, macOS and
> OpenBSD not supporting it. Assuming I'm not completely wrong (a 1 minute
> search shows it's in the ballpark) we could perhaps add something like
> "Unsupported platforms include (but isn't limited to) Windows and macOS" which
> would provide a bit more clarity.
If we do anything about this, I'd just say "systems that have
posix_fadvise()". If we write something more specific it's likely to
become obsolete, and it doesn't seem to me that it's hard for someone
to research "does my box have posix_fadvise()?".
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Igor Korot | 2025-04-23 18:32:50 | Re: Another documentation issue |
Previous Message | Christophe Pettus | 2025-04-23 16:47:50 | Re: Feature Proposal: Column-Level DELETE Operation in SQL |