| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Getting rid of pg_pltemplate |
| Date: | 2011-08-23 18:48:17 |
| Message-ID: | 1430.1314125297@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
> On Aug 23, 2011, at 8:31 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Having done that, we'd mark all the standard "trusted" PLs as dba_create,
>> expand the existing definition scripts for the PL extensions so that they
>> fully specify the languages and their support functions (transferring all
>> that knowledge from the current contents of pg_pltemplate), and then
>> remove pg_pltemplate.
> What about untrusted languages?
Untrusted languages would still need to be installed by superusers.
At least, that's the policy enforced by the current contents of
pg_pltemplate, and I wasn't planning to question it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2011-08-23 18:57:28 | Re: Why doesn't psql use the information schema to get ACL description ? |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-08-23 18:07:33 | Re: SSI 2PC coverage |