| From: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Checksums by default? |
| Date: | 2017-01-25 05:02:25 |
| Message-ID: | 142a230c-4fb5-317b-438a-ee5390873059@BlueTreble.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/24/17 10:30 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> Tom is correct here. They are not a net win for the average user. We
> tend to forget that although we collectively have a lot of enterprise
> installs where this does matter, we collectively do not equal near the
> level of average user installs.
>
> From an advocacy perspective, the average user install is the one that
> we tend most because that tending (in theory) will grow something that
> is more fruitful e.g; the enterprise install over time because we
> constantly and consistently provided a reasonable and expected
> experience to the average user.
I'm not completely grokking your second paragraph, but I would think
that an average user would love got get a heads-up that their hardware
is failing.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2017-01-25 05:04:30 | Re: Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm. |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2017-01-25 04:48:58 | Re: patch: function xmltable |