Re: rules regression test fix

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: rules regression test fix
Date: 2002-08-27 22:18:36
Message-ID: 14298.1030486716@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> I've seen this kind of problem before, but not often enough to bother
> me. I was actually thinking that each parallel test should use its own
> schema.

That's a thought, but again it's only a partial solution. Stuff that
looks directly at the system catalogs (like the rules regression test)
isn't going to be magically insulated by having a separate schema...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ross J. Reedstrom 2002-08-27 22:30:04 Re: Proposed GUC Variable
Previous Message Neil Conway 2002-08-27 22:12:44 fix for palloc() of user-supplied length