Re: feature request for Postgresql Rule system.

From: Richard Broersma Jr <rabroersma(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Richard Broersma Jr <rabroersma(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Subject: Re: feature request for Postgresql Rule system.
Date: 2006-12-18 23:06:39
Message-ID: 142808.40898.qm@web31802.mail.mud.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> None of A, C, I, or D say that you need to report a truthful update
> count.
>
> The fact that the update count is wrong with updatable views is a known
> deficiency.

I see. However, my my case I would like all of the sql statments in the rule to succeed and if
they don't I would want none of them to succeed so that at least my data isn't partially changed.
Is there anyway to catch this?

Regards,

Richard Broersma Jr.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2006-12-18 23:23:49 Re: feature request for Postgresql Rule system.
Previous Message Lars Heidieker 2006-12-18 22:55:05 Re: Stored Procedure and Trigger they puzzle me