Re: fixing PQsetvalue()

From: Pavel Golub <pavel(at)microolap(dot)com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>, Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavel Golub <pavel(at)microolap(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: fixing PQsetvalue()
Date: 2011-07-18 10:38:37
Message-ID: 141800615.20110718133837@gf.microolap.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello, Merlin.

I hope it's OK that I've added Andrew's patch to CommitFest:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=606

I did this becuase beta3 already released, but nut nothig is done on
this bug.

You wrote:

MM> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com> wrote:
>>>    you are creating as you iterate through.  This behavior was
>>>    unnecessary in terms of what libpqtypes and friends needed and may (as
>>>    Tom suggested) come back to bite us at some point. As it turns out,
>>>    PQsetvalue's operation on results that weren't created via
>>>    PQmakeEmptyResult was totally busted because of the bug, so we have a
>>>    unique opportunity to tinker with libpq here: you could argue that you
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Exactly at this moment I am thinking about using modifiable
>>> (via PQsetvalue) PGresult instead of std::map in my C++ library
>>> for store parameters for binding to executing command.
>>> I am already designed how to implement it, and I supposed that
>>> PQsetvalue is intended to work with any PGresult and not only
>>> with those which has been created via PQmakeEmptyResult...
>>> So, I am absolutely sure, that PQsetvalue should works with
>>> any PGresult.
>>
>> All PGresults are created via PQmakeEmptyPGresult, including libpqtypes.
>>  Actually, libpqtypes calls PQcopyResult which calls PQmakeEmptyPGresult.
>>
>> It might be better to say a "server" result vs. a "client" result.
>> Currently, PQsetvalue is broken when provided a "server" generated result.

MM> er, right-- the divergence was in how the tuples were getting added --
MM> thanks for the clarification. essentially your attached patch fixes
MM> that divergence.

MM> merlin

--
With best wishes,
Pavel mailto:pavel(at)gf(dot)microolap(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-07-18 10:52:50 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add temp_file_limit GUC parameter to constrain temporary file sp
Previous Message Pavel Golub 2011-07-18 10:24:49 Re: Error in PQsetvalue