Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes

From: Rahila Syed <rahilasyed(dot)90(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes
Date: 2014-12-05 06:49:25
Message-ID: 1417762165579-5829339.post@n5.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>If that's really true, we could consider having no configuration any
>time, and just compressing always. But I'm skeptical that it's
>actually true.

I was referring to this for CPU utilization:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1410414381339-5818552.post@n5.nabble.com
<http://>

The above tests were performed on machine with configuration as follows
Server specifications:
Processors:Intel® Xeon ® Processor E5-2650 (2 GHz, 8C/16T, 20 MB) * 2 nos
RAM: 32GB
Disk : HDD 450GB 10K Hot Plug 2.5-inch SAS HDD * 8 nos
1 x 450 GB SAS HDD, 2.5-inch, 6Gb/s, 10,000 rpm

Thank you,
Rahila Syed

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.nabble.com/Compression-of-full-page-writes-tp5769039p5829339.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2014-12-05 06:55:53 Re: On partitioning
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2014-12-05 06:46:15 Re: Yet another abort-early plan disaster on 9.3