From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
Cc: | elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <stehule(at)kix(dot)fsv(dot)cvut(dot)cz>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: array concat, et al patch (was: [GENERAL] join of array) |
Date: | 2003-08-17 23:45:40 |
Message-ID: | 14152.1061163940@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-patches |
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> The attached patch fixes code and regression tests for the following
> 1) Array concatenation of equidimensional arrays:
> 2) Array literals or vars in ARRAY expressions:
> 3) Lower bound of outer array adjusted downward when an "element" (which
> could itself be an array) is concatenated onto the front of an array:
Applied with only marginal changes. (I thought the element-type checks
removed from parse_expr.c had better be applied at runtime; and
I noticed that array_cat scribbled on its inputs in some cases.)
> docs to follow once
> I'm sure what actually ends up being committed.
You're on the hook for docs fixes...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2003-08-17 23:54:02 | Re: Need feedback on new feature (\for) |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2003-08-17 23:29:02 | Re: Need feedback on new feature (\for) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2003-08-18 00:17:41 | Re: array concat, et al patch |
Previous Message | Matthew D. Fuller | 2003-08-17 05:48:54 | Re: Arrays and "goodness" in RDBMSs (was Re: join of array) |