Re: Let's drop two obsolete features which are bear-traps for novices

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> There is a real advantage of money over numeric in the performance
> front. I haven't measured it, but suffice to say that money uses
> integer operations which map almost directly to CPU instructions,
> whereas numeric needs to decode from our varlena base-10000 digit
> format, operate on digits at a time, then encode back. No matter how
> much you optimize numeric, it's never going to outperform stuff that
> runs practically on bare electrons. As far as I recall, some TPCH
> queries run aggregations on currency columns.
>
> Now, whether this makes a measurable difference or not in TPCH terms, I
> have no idea.

Best of 3 tries on each statement...

A count(*) as a baseline:

test=# do $$ begin perform count(*) from generate_series(1,10000000); end; $$;
DO
Time: 3260.920 ms

A sum of money:

test=# do $$ begin perform sum('10000.01'::money) from generate_series(1,10000000); end; $$;
DO
Time: 3572.709 ms

A sum of numeric:

test=# do $$ begin perform sum('10000.01'::numeric) from generate_series(1,10000000); end; $$;
DO
Time: 4805.559 ms

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company