Re: Proposed GUC Variable

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposed GUC Variable
Date: 2002-08-27 22:08:40
Message-ID: 14141.1030486120@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> But we should have some default to print some of the query,

Why? So far you've been told by two different people (make that three
now) that such a behavior is useless, and no one's weighed in in its
favor ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-08-27 22:10:27 Re: Open 7.3 items
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-08-27 22:07:07 Re: LIMIT 1 FOR UPDATE or FOR UPDATE LIMIT 1?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2002-08-27 22:12:44 fix for palloc() of user-supplied length
Previous Message Joe Conway 2002-08-27 22:03:22 Re: rules regression test fix