From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Views as FROM subselects |
Date: | 2000-12-15 23:09:33 |
Message-ID: | 14126.976921773@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom, I see from the CVS logs you say:
> Subselects in FROM clause, per ISO syntax: FROM (SELECT ...) [AS] alias.
> (Don't forget that an alias is required.) Views reimplemented as expanding
> to subselect-in-FROM. Grouping, aggregates, DISTINCT in views actually
> work now (he says optimistically). No UNION support in subselects/views
> yet, but I have some ideas about that. Rule-related permissions checking
> moved out of rewriter and into executor.
> Does this mean the rewrite system no longer handles views?
Sure it does. It got a lot simpler though.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-12-15 23:15:07 | Re: CURRENT/OLD keywords still broken |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-12-15 23:08:08 | Re: TOAST-table vacuuming (was Re: Idea for reducing pl anning time) |