Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Indent authentication overloading

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Indent authentication overloading
Date: 2011-03-19 16:39:03
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 16:24, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> ... The docs need
>> to state the truth, namely that "ident" is still allowed as a synonym
>> for "peer" on local connections. Otherwise people will get confused
>> as to why their pg_hba files still work.

> Hmm: Good point, update attached.

That looks OK to me.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-03-19 16:45:01
Subject: Re: Collations versus record-returning functions
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2011-03-19 16:02:15
Subject: Re: Indent authentication overloading

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group