Re: [HACKERS] win32 crash in initdb

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] win32 crash in initdb
Date: 2004-07-29 14:49:46
Message-ID: 14102.1091112586@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32

"Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> writes:
> The crash people are getting in initdb is due to the 1.19 revision to
> pgtz.c. Not sure why yet...looking into it...

Unfortunate behavior when probing pre-1970 dates, maybe?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2004-07-29 14:51:52 Re: more signals (was: Function to kill backend)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-07-29 14:47:55 Re: Sketch of extending error handling for subtransactions in functions

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-07-29 14:57:28 Re: localtime() for win32 problem.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-07-29 14:30:20 Re: Logger subprocess for win32