| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Interactive Documentation - how do you want it towork? |
| Date: | 2003-02-03 14:39:25 |
| Message-ID: | 14092.1044283165@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> Perhaps we should then prune the garbage out of the old version, and
> make the comments version specific so that we start afresh with the new
> docs, but leave the useful comments against the older versions?
It seems clear to me that the comments *should* be version specific,
if that's at all feasible. When we make a new release then we can
start with zero comments if that seems appropriate --- but as long as
an older set of docs remains on-line, it should have the comments that
were made for it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-02-03 14:42:02 | Re: targetlist functions part 1 (was [HACKERS] targetlist |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-02-03 14:02:41 | Re: MOVE LAST: why? |