| From: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Amit Khandekar <amit(dot)khandekar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers |
| Date: | 2014-08-27 21:09:39 |
| Message-ID: | 1409173779.26972.YahooMailNeo@web122305.mail.ne1.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> wrote:
> Something to keep in mind is that users will definitely think about NEW/OLD as
> tables. I suspect that it won't be long after release before someone asks
> why they can't create an index on it. :)
I'm comfortable saying "No" to that. But it's a good point -- I'll
review error checking and documentation to make sure that it is
clear.
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2014-08-27 21:11:06 | Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2014-08-27 21:03:04 | Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers |